By using this website, you agree to our Terms of Use (click here)
Is it possible to remove the requirement on the Additional Remittance form to be just a remittance form? I would like it to print when doing an ACH type transaction. But if I assign it in place of the check it doesn't print....
Thanks!
Hi Bodonna,
I'm not sure I understand. Can you take a screenshot of the Payment Methods (CA204000) screen for your ACH payment method?
As far as I know, you have to choose Print Checks under ADDITIONAL PROCESSING if you want the Report and Remittance Report fields to be available. But it seems to me like you are doing something else which is why a screenshot would help me understand better.
Tim,
I don't have a solution for this, only questions. If you want to create a NACHA format file for all payments in a batch, don't need to mark 'Create Batch Payments' in the Payment Method screen above? This option appears to the be either / or choice between printing a remittance form and create an export batch. What am I missing?
Instead of printing the AP 64.10.00 I would like to print the AP.64.20.00 in it's place. The actual bill payment part is done manually through the banks website. But it would be nice to have a record/remittance that can be printed.
I agree with you @shawn-slavin, Create Batch Payments is normally what I see in ACH situations so the NACHA file gets generated automatically.
But, @bodonna, if what you want is really just the AP.62.20.00 form to print in place of the AP.64.10.00, why not just edit the Report field and replace AP.64.10.00 with AP.64.20.00 like this?
That's what I'm trying to figure out how to do....It has some kind of restriction on it that I think is tied to the lines per stub. It will not print on it's own...
Ah, I hadn't even tried printing. I just tried it and got an empty form like this:
Is that what you are getting?
Got it. I think it's something to do with the filters. Have you tried removing the filters?
Online Members
