AugForums.com

An Acumatica User Group

  • Free
    • Start Here
    • In-Person Gatherings
    • Power BI Workshop
    • Podcast
    • Rolodex
    • Blog
    • Forums
  • Paid
    • AugSQL
    • GI Course
    • GI Library
    • Consulting
  • Register

Looking to the Future

March 5, 2014 by Tim Rodman

This week I put together a document called Case For Ending Sage 500 Maintenance (click the link to see the PDF document). My company currently pays a very sizable sum of money every year to Sage for the privilege of upgrading to the latest version of Sage 500 ERP. In recent years, however, it has become apparent that this money would be better spent on other things.

In contrast, each new version of Acumatica is providing substantial new features. Even the upcoming release of the lowly version 4.11 is full of many new features (the number of the version suggests that version 4.11 is supposed to be only slightly better than the current version 4.1 and significantly less “cool” than version 5.0 which is due this Summer).

I would gladly recommend that my company pay maintenance on Sage 500 ERP if it continued to deliver substantial new features like Acumatica.

Filed Under: Miscellaneous Tagged With: Acumatica, Acumatica Blog, Acumatica Maintenance, Acumatica Training, Acumatica vs. Sage 500, MAS 500 Maintenance, Sage 500 End of Life, Sage 500 ERP Maintenance, Sage 500 Maintenance

Comments

  1. Tim Rodman says

    March 8, 2014 at 11:30 pm

    Here are a couple of interesting articles on ERP software maintenance fees.

    This one basically recommends not canceling maintenance, but I don’t think that Sage 500 ERP falls into this category since it’s very likely going to go away in 2017:
    http://panorama-consulting.com/canceling-erp-software-maintenance-when-the-corporate-hero-becomes-the-erp-fall-guy/

    This article is a little more in favor of leaving your software vendor because of high maintenance fees:
    http://panorama-consulting.com/shifting-erp-system-maintenance-to-a-third-party-support-provider/

  2. Tim Rodman says

    March 6, 2014 at 11:32 am

    I completely agree Andy. You would think that Sage would have lowered their maintenance costs or sent clear signals sooner about which products were going away. Their portfolio consolidation process has been so long and drawn out that I think they have lost the trust of many of their customers. Either end a product or keep it, but don’t draw out the process and continue to charge high maintenance fees while doing it.

    This is a good thing for Acumatica though. I think that a lot of current Sage customers on retired Sage products will move to Acumatica since they no longer trust Sage. Sure, they could upgrade to another Sage product, but how long until that product is also put out to pasture?

    • Andy says

      March 7, 2014 at 4:35 am

      Yeah, exactly, and especially with a product like 300 which they bought and haven’t really known what to do with. Our clients are constantly complaining about the maintenance fee and the lack of value for money. If you take the cost over the last 5 years, it’s pretty much a new accounting system, just without any ROI.

      By continuing to charge the annual fee though, it gives customers some hope that the product isn’t dead and they don’t need to look elsewhere. So it can prove a tough battle trying to convince them to move away. Especially as I can’t use the line “All that money you’ve spent in the last 5 years has been for nothing!”

      That said, with the end to Server 2003 and XP support this year and the cost of new hardware to upgrade, customers are looking to the cloud and Sage have no decent offering, so it opens up Acumatica.

      Love your blog by the way, I started learning Acumatica 18 months ago and it’s interesting seeing someone go through all those same steps now. I really like the multiple choice questions in the university. It means I can do the exercises and then immediately get certified while it’s still fresh in my mind.

    • Tim Rodman says

      March 7, 2014 at 1:33 pm

      I like the way you describe it, “by continuing to charge the annual fee though, it gives customers some hope that the product isn’t dead and they don’t need to look elsewhere.”

      This strategy of intentional ambiguity has allowed Sage to milk more cash out of their customers in the short run, but it will backfire in the long run since it has caused them to lose the trust of many of their customers. Even if X3 is the best product in the world, it’s not always about the technology, but about trusting who you buy the technology from.

      Let’s keep in touch about differences between Sage 300/500 and Acumatica. I’d love to hear your perspective. So far I’ve only really looked at the Financial area in Acumatica, but I’ll be looking at the Inventory area next.

  3. Andy says

    March 6, 2014 at 1:46 am

    I love how many features Acumatica pack in to their releases every 6 months. More than Sage have added to 300 in about 5 years! They can stick their 10% annual maintenance! Haha!

By using this website, you agree to our Terms of Use (click here)
Building Generic Inquiries & Pivot Tables

Online Members

 No online members at the moment

Recent Blog Posts

  • Acumatica Summit 2026 – Day 1 Keynote (Seattle, WA) January 26, 2026
  • EP 161: Arline Welty – Evaluate Acumatica with YOUR DATA before you buy (Podcast) January 12, 2026
  • EP 160: How long does it take an Automation Schedule to run in Acumatica (Podcast) November 7, 2025
  • EP 159: Mark Safran – Smartsheet Dashboards with Acumatica data (Podcast) October 29, 2025
  • EP 158: Garrett Rochell – Acumatica Upgades, especially with the Modern UI (Podcast) October 4, 2025

Recent Forum Posts

  • Julie Baker

    RE: Credit Reference Report Needed

    @pmkohler Patrick, did you ever get this working? I wou...

    By Julie Baker , 15 hours ago

  • John Rygielski

    Tax on Inventory Transfer

    Our clients are in the Oil & Gas industry. There ar...

    By John Rygielski , 2 weeks ago

  • Brynn Rutherford

    Can't export GI's to excel that contain the FATrans DAC after upgrade to 2025 R1 in less than 25 min

    Hi, We have a Fixed Asset Generic Inquiry that combin...

    By Brynn Rutherford , 3 weeks ago

  • Lunar Windbloom

    RE: Feeling Stuck on Making a Sandbox of our Database

    @timrodman @toonsix Thank you! I need to figure out why...

    By Lunar Windbloom , 4 weeks ago

  • Tim Rodman

    RE: Attribute Input Mask

    Regular Expressions are a standard Linux thing and you ...

    By Tim Rodman , 4 weeks ago

  • Tim Rodman

    RE: Feeling Stuck on Making a Sandbox of our Database

    Ya, if you can't get the size down by deleting the snap...

    By Tim Rodman , 4 weeks ago

  • Tim Rodman

    RE: What Triggers a Customization to need a Restart?

    @tlaird self-hosting totally makes sense to me for peop...

    By Tim Rodman , 4 weeks ago

  • Tim Rodman

    RE: Invoice subreport for line-level tax breakdown not tieing to taxes subtotal

    It's not really an Acumatica problem huh; it's a math p...

    By Tim Rodman , 2 months ago

  • Rob Neal

    Invoice subreport for line-level tax breakdown not tieing to taxes subtotal

    We have a customer with a modified SO invoice form that...

    By Rob Neal , 2 months ago

Terms of Use & Disclaimers :: Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2026 · AUG Forums, LLC. All rights reserved. This website is not owned, affiliated with, or endorsed by Acumatica, Inc.